You either consult a solicitor and sue her for the excess in the small claims court, or forget it… You can sue both her and her insurers… Whether you can get anything done about the state of the greenhouse on her property is debateable,,,,Perhaps not until further damage is caused….
She didn’t cause the wind. If your insurance isn’t subrogating against her, you are going to have a tough time, plus you create an enemy in the person next door.
What kind of maintenance do you think could have been done to a greenhouse to keep the wind from damaging it?
You might be able to get her under the rule of ‘Rylands and Fletcher’ where if someone brings something onto their land which is a ‘non-natural’ use then they are strictly liable should it escape. i.e. negligence does not have to be proved.
Just quoting the rule might give the insurers something to think about even if they can refute it.
The second choice would be to hold her liable as a private nuisance. . .
take photos as proof.
go to citizens advice brureu or go to small claims court but it could cos you
Ask for maintenance record(s) from your neighbor or their ins. company
You either consult a solicitor and sue her for the excess in the small claims court, or forget it… You can sue both her and her insurers… Whether you can get anything done about the state of the greenhouse on her property is debateable,,,,Perhaps not until further damage is caused….
push the thing over on a windy night time that will sort out, dirty trick but if she dont care why should you go for it
She didn’t cause the wind. If your insurance isn’t subrogating against her, you are going to have a tough time, plus you create an enemy in the person next door.
What kind of maintenance do you think could have been done to a greenhouse to keep the wind from damaging it?
You might be able to get her under the rule of ‘Rylands and Fletcher’ where if someone brings something onto their land which is a ‘non-natural’ use then they are strictly liable should it escape. i.e. negligence does not have to be proved.
Just quoting the rule might give the insurers something to think about even if they can refute it.
The second choice would be to hold her liable as a private nuisance. . .